Final Keyword
Regarding the generic deep __clone() example provided by david ashe at metabin:
If your object has a variable that stores an array of objects, that particular __clone() example will NOT perform a deep copy on your array of objects.
Object cloning
Creating a copy of an object with fully replicated properties is not always the wanted behavior. A good example of the need for copy constructors, is if you have an object which represents a GTK window and the object holds the resource of this GTK window, when you create a duplicate you might want to create a new window with the same properties and have the new object hold the resource of the new window. Another example is if your object holds a reference to another object which it uses and when you replicate the parent object you want to create a new instance of this other object so that the replica has its own separate copy.
An object copy is created by using the clone keyword (which calls the object's __clone() method if possible). An object's __clone() method cannot be called directly.
$copy_of_object = clone $object;
When an object is cloned, PHP 5 will perform a shallow copy of all of the object's properties. Any properties that are references to other variables, will remain references. If a __clone() method is defined, then the newly created object's __clone() method will be called, to allow any necessary properties that need to be changed.
Example #1 Cloning an object
<?php
class SubObject
{
static $instances = 0;
public $instance;
public function __construct() {
$this->instance = ++self::$instances;
}
public function __clone() {
$this->instance = ++self::$instances;
}
}
class MyCloneable
{
public $object1;
public $object2;
function __clone()
{
// Force a copy of this->object, otherwise
// it will point to same object.
$this->object1 = clone $this->object1;
}
}
$obj = new MyCloneable();
$obj->object1 = new SubObject();
$obj->object2 = new SubObject();
$obj2 = clone $obj;
print("Original Object:\n");
print_r($obj);
print("Cloned Object:\n");
print_r($obj2);
?>
The above example will output:
Original Object: MyCloneable Object ( [object1] => SubObject Object ( [instance] => 1 ) [object2] => SubObject Object ( [instance] => 2 ) ) Cloned Object: MyCloneable Object ( [object1] => SubObject Object ( [instance] => 3 ) [object2] => SubObject Object ( [instance] => 2 ) )
add a note
User Contributed NotesObject cloning
Jim Brown
20-Jul-2008 05:34
20-Jul-2008 05:34
alex dot offshore at gmail dot com
19-May-2008 05:23
19-May-2008 05:23
Remember that in PHP 5 ALL objects are assigned BY REFERENCE.
<?php
function foo($a) // notice that '&' near $a is missing
{
$a['bar'] = 10;
}
$x = array('bar' => 0); // built-in array() is not an object
$y = new ArrayObject(array('bar' => 0));
echo "\$x['bar'] == ${x['bar']};\n\$y['bar'] == ${y['bar']};\n\n";
foo($x);
foo($y);
echo "\$x['bar'] == ${x['bar']};\n\$y['bar'] == ${y['bar']};\n";
?>
Output:
$x['bar'] == 0;
$y['bar'] == 0;
$x['bar'] == 0;
$y['bar'] == 10;
Hope this will be useful.
By the way, to determine whether the variable is compatible with ArrayAccess/ArrayObject see http://php.net/manual/en/function.is-array.php#48083
crrodriguez at suse dot de
13-Mar-2008 12:52
13-Mar-2008 12:52
Keep in mind that since PHP 5.2.5, trying to clone a non-object correctly results in a fatal error, this differs from previous versions where only a Warning was thrown.
Hayley Watson
18-Dec-2007 06:51
18-Dec-2007 06:51
It should go without saying that if you have circular references, where a property of object A refers to object B while a property of B refers to A (or more indirect loops than that), then you'll be glad that clone does NOT automatically make a deep copy!
<?php
class Foo
{
var $that;
function __clone()
{
$this->that = clone $this->that;
}
}
$a = new Foo;
$b = new Foo;
$a->that = $b;
$b->that = $a;
$c = clone $a;
echo 'What happened?';
var_dump($c);
david ashe at metabin
03-Dec-2007 01:18
03-Dec-2007 01:18
Here is a function to clone all of the objects automatically
(useful if you use a base class that has this method)
function __clone(){
foreach($this as $name => $value){
if(gettype($value)=='object'){
$this->$name= clone($this->$name);
}
}
}
tomi at cumulo dot fi
13-Nov-2007 06:57
13-Nov-2007 06:57
It should be noticed that __clone() does not allow you to return a value. Basically the idea is that you implement this magic method only when you want to execute operations inside the cloned object, immediately prior to the cloning. In this way __clone() is similar to the default destructor (__destruct()), in that it executes code right before the object is destroyed.
muratyaman at gmail dot com
08-Oct-2007 09:43
08-Oct-2007 09:43
I think this is a bit awkward:
<?php
class A{
public $aaa;
}
class B{
public $a;
public $bbb;
function __clone(){
$this->a = clone $this->a;//clone MANUALLY!!!
}
}
$b1 = new B();
$b1->a = new A();
$b1->a->aaa = 111;
$b1->bbb = 1;
$b2 = clone $b1;
$b2->a->aaa = 222;//BEWARE!!
$b2->bbb = 2;//no problem on basic types
var_dump($b1); echo '<br />';
var_dump($b2);
/*
OUTPUT BEFORE implementing the function __clone()
object(B)#2 (3) { ["a"]=> object(A)#3 (1) { ["aaa"]=> int(222) } ["bbb"]=> int(1) }
object(B)#4 (3) { ["a"]=> object(A)#3 (1) { ["aaa"]=> int(222) } ["bbb"]=> int(2) }
OUTPUT AFTER implementing the function __clone()
object(B)#1 (3) { ["a"]=> object(A)#2 (1) { ["aaa"]=> int(111) } ["bbb"]=> int(1) }
object(B)#3 (3) { ["a"]=> object(A)#4 (1) { ["aaa"]=> int(222) } ["bbb"]=> int(2) }
*/
?>
Whenever we use another class inside, we must clone it manually. If you have 10s of classes related, this is rather tedious. I don't want to even think about classes dynamically populated with other objects. Be careful when designing your classes! You should look after your objects all the time! This major change on PHP5 vs PHP4 regarding "references" definitely has very good performance improvements but comes with very dangerous side effects as well..
Alexey
08-Feb-2007 10:18
08-Feb-2007 10:18
To implement __clone() method in complex classes I use this simple function:
function clone_($some)
{
return (is_object($some)) ? clone $some : $some;
}
In this way I don't need to care about type of my class properties.
MakariVerslund at gmail dot com
22-Jan-2007 07:30
22-Jan-2007 07:30
I ran into the same problem of an array of objects inside of an object that I wanted to clone all pointing to the same objects. However, I agreed that serializing the data was not the answer. It was relatively simple, really:
public function __clone() {
foreach ($this->varName as &$a) {
foreach ($a as &$b) {
$b = clone $b;
}
}
}
Note, that I was working with a multi-dimensional array and I was not using the Key=>Value pair system, but basically, the point is that if you use foreach, you need to specify that the copied data is to be accessed by reference.
jorge dot villalobos at gmail dot com
31-Mar-2005 06:29
31-Mar-2005 06:29
I think it's relevant to note that __clone is NOT an override. As the example shows, the normal cloning process always occurs, and it's the responsibility of the __clone method to "mend" any "wrong" action performed by it.